The Ombudsman is a public office created by the
Constitution. It is considered as the activist watchman and the preserver of
the integrity of public service.
The Constitution granted the Ombudsman with certain
powers such as to investigate on its own. It can also investigate on complaint
filed by any person regarding illegal, unjust or improper acts or omission of
any public official, employee, office, or agency.
In line with its power to prosecute offenses of public
officers, Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales is asking the Congress to give the
office the power to access bank records. This was prompted when the Supreme
Court weakened the Ombudsman powers by ruling that the office can only access
the bank records of suspected erring officials when a case has already been
filed in court. The Ombudsman believes that if given this additional power, the
office would be able fast-track the investigation of cases.
It is true that the Ombudsman is vested with great
powers to investigate but this power should also have limitations in order to
prevent abuse of power or violation of due process. The granting of power to
access bank records of government official can be helpful for the speedy
prosecution of corrupt officials even before the case is filed in court. But
this power should not be absolute. It can be allowed only when certain elements
such as presence of probable cause or suspicious acts is present. One example
is when what is declared in Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth of
a government official or employee is obviously inconsistent to his to extravagant
lifestyle.
It is time for the Ombudsman to regain the public
trust, which was diminished in the past administrations, by being firm and courageous
in prosecuting corrupt officials. The office can only be tough if granted with
powers but without unlawful treatment to the suspected erring officials.
No comments:
Post a Comment