The Metro Rail Transit or MRT 3
has provided several commuters, out there, a quick route from getting to work
in and getting home without the hassle of enduring traffic congestions. However
as years passes by, the once quick alternative to commute everyday has become
one of the dreaded, slowest, and longest means to get to point A to point B. A
lot of commuters now points fingers to the heads of the MRT, while the heads of
the MRT point to our government, while the government points back. Who is to
blame? Who must be liable? Will this ever change?
Senator
Grace Poe, as her capacity as the
Chairperson for the Senate subcommittee on public service, recommended that the
blame and charges must be against the Transport Secretary Joseph Emilio Abaya
and other transportation officials for their “negligence and inactions” that
resulted in the problems Metro Rail Transit problems. The subcommittee filed
reports which states that there are strong indications of violations of the
republic Act No. 3019, or the Anti-graft and Corruption Practices Act was made by the MRT officials. Grace Poe
added the it does not take an expert to analyze the failures of management,
just ask the passengers who line up for hours and experience the stalling
trains, the out-of-order elevators and escalators, the broken aircon units,
among others.
After
the MRT signed a multi-million maintenance contract with joint venture of Busan
Transportation Corporation, Edison Development & Construction, Tramat
Mercantile, Inc., TMICorp Inc., and Castan Corporation. Nothing much happened other than new coaches
and trains will be operational, but that was no gurantee if it will fix
everything. Speaking of the contract, Abaya now points the blame to Mar Roxas,
wherein Abaya defended himself by stating that he was not aware of the shady
contract when he was put into the position and that the contract was made
during Mar Roxas regime.
Who
may ever is to be blamed, this officials should stop pointing fingers and start
doing something about it. It is there obligation to provide the public a safe
environment and to protect the welfare of the people, as embodied within the
1987 constitution. It is stated in Republic Act 6713 or the "Code of
Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees, Under Section
2, which provides that It is the policy
of the State to promote a high standard of ethics in public service. Public
officials and employees shall at all times be accountable to the people and
shall discharge their duties with utmost responsibility, integrity, competence,
and loyalty, act with patriotism and justice, lead modest lives, and uphold
public interest over personal interest. It is clear enough within our own laws,
that these public officers should uphold what their position stand for.
Each
public officer should be liable, stop pointing fingers and do something about
what is happening to our country. There position means something, and it should
stand for something, and by blaming one another is not the way. The solution
could be in the form of removing somebody from their current position or any other
means to solve the country’s problems.
They
were put there for a reason, they were put there to serve the public, they were
there to stand for something. Not just a pretty face or the face of something
unlawful or deceitful. If they want to be the face of something, they must be
the face of the solution and not the problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment