Privacy is the right that
determines the nonintervention of secret surveillance and the protection of an
individual's information. In the case Morfe
v. Mutoc, the Court recognized that certain constitutional guarantees work
together to create zones of privacy. The Court followed the rule in the United
States case Griswold v. Connecticut. The court explained the relevance of these zones
in "In the Matter of the Petition
for Issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus of Sabio v. Senator Gordon", thus:
Zones of privacy
are recognized and protected in our laws. Within these zones, any form of
intrusion is impermissible unless excused by law and in accordance with
customary legal process. The meticulous regard we accord to these zones arises
not only from our conviction that the right to privacy is a
"constitutional right" and "the right most valued by civilized
men," but also from our adherence to the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights which mandates that, "no one shall be subjected to arbitrary
interference with his privacy" and "everyone has the right to the
protection of the law against such interference or attacks."
In this age of modern technology,
the legislative department of the government is working on how these zones of
privacy will be protected. Several bills were passed and became law to adopt in
the continuous change of technology. In 2012, the cybercrime law was approved.
The law sought to protect the users and penalize offenders in the cyber world.
This paper aims to outline the
extent of protection of the citizen's exercise of the right to privacy
expected as applied in the cyber world and the limitations in the exercise thereof.
No comments:
Post a Comment